wanting the popcorn to save the film is in bad taste

Friday, August 27, 2010

Aashayein

5:17 AM Posted by Gautam Chintamani , , , No comments

*This review might contain spoilers

Rahul Sharma (John Abraham) is a compulsive gambler who hopes to strike it big some day. Following his mantra of ‘all or nothing’ he puts everything at stake and ends up winning more money that he could ever dream of. Rahul loves his life and hopes to settle down with lady love Nafisa (Sonal Sehgal) but life ends up playing the same game of all or nothing on him. When he gets to know that he just has 3 months more to live Rahul believes that he can be his cool self and go with a smile but the when the realization dawns upon him he loses his bearings. Unable to express himself to the people near him he decides to live at hospice. He meets Padma (Anaitha Nair), a fellow terminally ill patient who not only understand his fears but also the zeal to live a complete life in some months.

In the making for many years Nagesh Kukunoor’s Aashayein aims at being the Anand of this generation and even uses iconic moments from the evergreen film as an ode. A film about imminent death can be sad, painful, endearing, bitter, and sweet but it also runs the risk of being boring and sadly a huge portion of Aashayein falls in this category.

A certain film called Bombay to Bangkok notwithstanding, Nagesh Kukunoor has carved an exclusive place for himself in Hindi films but off late he seems to be in a transitory phase. Aashayein shows a certain state of flux the filmmaker’s mind might be in for the film never really gets a grip on itself. The film starts off with a very strange and solemn feel perhaps to depict Rahul’s gambler state of mind and he seems restrained even when he is celebrating his win. We never really get to witness his ‘compulsive gambler’ full of beans side so to expect us to feel his pain is asking for too much.

Kukunoor has been known to extract engaging performances from his actors in almost every film and John Abraham joins the list. Never really considered an ‘actor’ Abraham manages to surprise with a pretty decent show especially in the scenes with Anaitha Nair, who is a real treat! Nair infuses life into proceedings and shares a fantastic camaraderie with Abraham, who greatly benefits.

While Aashayein tries to be ‘real’ it falls prey to the trappings of films about the indomitable fighting spirit usually posses. There is a great deal of theatrics that such a subject can’t seem to escape and Aashayein has oodles of sad tales- an HIV Positive middle aged prostitute (Farida Jalal) whom no one wants to talk to, a successful businessman (Girish Karnad) abandoned by his family amongst others. Kukunoor’s unsure screenplay is largely responsible for keeping the film at a distance for even with some sweet moments Aashayein never really manages to strike any chord.

Rating: 2/5

Cast: John Abraham, Anaitha Nair, Sonal Sehgal, Farida Jalal and Girish Karnard

Written and Directed by: Nagesh Kukunoor


Thursday, August 26, 2010

Madholal Keep Walking

10:49 PM Posted by Gautam Chintamani , , , No comments

Madholal Dubey (Subrat Dutta) is one of millions living in Mumbai who go about life with a spring in their step no matter what. Working as a security guard in the city, the only ‘friends’ Madholal has made are the ones who meet him everyday in the local train he takes to work. In between the friendly banter of the train friends, his loving wife Kamla (Neela Gokhle), the obligatory tension of getting his daughter, Sudha (Swara Bhaskar) married, Madholal’s life comprises of hanging out with Anwar (Pranay Narayan), the friendly neighbor whom Sudha secretly loves and dreaming of a better life. Things change forever when Madholal becomes a victim of the heinous Mumabi train attacks and his happy existence is washed away like a sand castle. Physically crippled and mentally scared for life, Madholal starts becomes a ghost amongst others and finds it difficult to accept things. Just when Madho starts to get along with life he gets to know that Anwar might be the mastermind behind the blasts.

Madholal Keep Walking starts off with a long and expounding dialogue laden scene, very reminiscent of Nishikant Kamat’s Dombivli Fast, which not only establishes the main players but also sets up the tone of the film. While the friendly repartee amongst Madholal and his fellow passengers in the local train has some light moments, Madholal Keep Walking is fraught with dialogue that might be very real but comes across as highly forced.

Director Jai Tank’s Madholal Keep Walking depicts a personal tragedy of a faceless man who could be anyone in the millions compelled to play their part and carry on irrespective of what happened. While this ode to humanity has its heart in the right place some where the film seems to lack the conviction in its own belief. Madholal’s pain of his life falling like a deck of cards seems to be visibly noticed by everyone around him but for some strange reason no one seems to feel it. There seems to be a great disconnect between the Madholal and everyone else; while he is reticent and contemplative his family and friends seem to be a tearing hurry for him to get back in the groove. The post tragedy scenes have too much talk where everyone’s stating the obvious besides a song (Naina Lage) that has three versions and yet fails to rouse any emotion.

Jai Tank, who has co-written the film with Sachin Darekar, uses Mumbai’s fabled local train as motif of life and employs it as a device to convey that life, no matter what, has to carry on. While using the train as microcosm of a multicultural existence is an interesting tool, Tank never really explores the power it has on people’s lives. Having set up the train as an integral part of Madholal’s very existence, the film works towards the climax where Madholal would have to fight the weight of the memories of his last ride that changed the course of his life. But the manner in which Madholal overcomes his fears rather brazenly mocks the very human spirit this film pays a tribute to. To say that the trains started just three hours after the blasts and Madholal was a coward to stay away for such a long time might represent the spirit of Mumabi is conveying the message in a very simplistic and insensitively escapist manner.

In spite of scenes that seem to strangely strung, the actors chip in decent performances. Subrat Dutta as the protagonist looks a little young to play a college student’s father but is compelling; well poised and blessed with a great voice, Swara Bhaskar switches between playing a loving elder sister to a daughter who grows overnight into the breadwinner for the family with ease. In spite of the manner in which it ends Madholal Keep Walking is rather an honest film that could have been a very different film if it weren’t besieged by songs and a confused screenplay.

Rating: 2/5

Cast: Subrat Dutta, Neela Gokhale, Swara Bhaskar, Pranay Narayan

Written by: Jai Tank and Sachin Darekar

Directed by: Jai Tank

Image- www.madholalkeepwalking.com


Monday, August 16, 2010

Men Who Do Not Stare At The Normal Things

8:00 PM Posted by Unknown , No comments

With The Men Who Stare At Goats we are in the land where fantasy and reality roam hand in hand. This is a film based on a book by a journalist who stumbled upon a secret project funded by the US Army to create soldiers with Superpowers. Like walking through walls, becoming invisible and also killing goats by staring at them – therefore the title.

So far so good. We have seen such sci-fi or fantasy stuff. But the director does not treat it like that. This is a spoof, a satire – a commentary on how men go mad in the search for a silly fantasy.

The story is told through the eyes of the journalist on whose book the film is based. Initially he is fascinated by the project but soon he realizes that the soldiers who were part of the project have lost their marbles by abuse of drugs or other experiments.

The film shifts between present day Iraq and the history of the project starting from the late seventies. Most of the stuff is told normally but the characters who are part of the project have a certain edge to their behaviour. They make outlandish claims and are not able to demonstrate their super human skills. Instead of walking through walls, they stare at clouds and make them scatter. Something I remember I used to do a child. And I did not even need any training for it.

At one point Lynn Cassidy (George Clooney) and Bob Wilton (Ewan McGregor) are traveling through Iraq and reach a fork in the road. They do not understand which sign to follow. Lynn keeps staring at it for a long time. He claims that he will soon know the right answer through his psychic powers. When he finally chooses a road, their car is immediately blown up by a land mine. And when such disasters happen Lynn continues as if it was destined to happen.

In the end, the story converges on a similar facility in Iraq where the army is still carrying experiments. Eventually the narrator joins up with the founder of the original project and they are able to free the prisoners on whom new experiments are being conducted.

Somewhere in the middle, one comes across a rare moment in the film that surprises you by its poignancy. Lynn and Bob have escaped a kidnapping and gunfight and are eating at the house of an Iraqi whom they had saved from another kidnapping (I told you it is weird). Lynn apologizes for the gunfight that had been started by private American security forces. The Iraqi apologizes for his countrymen who did the kidnapping. And they continue to eat in the house that has been ransacked when the man was taken away.

Yes this is that kind of a film.

Friday, August 13, 2010

The Expendables

2:24 AM Posted by Gautam Chintamani , No comments

Barney Ross (Sylvester Stallone) leads The Expendables who might be a pack of highly trained mercenaries but all of them are in the twilight of their professional job. Contacted by a man called Mr. Church (Bruce Willis), the Expendables are asked to overthrow a ruthless South American dictator, General Garza (David Zayas). While on a reconnaissance mission Ross and Christmas (Jason Statham) learn that things aren’t as straight as they had expected and decide to pass the job. They escape but Ross can’t get Sandra (Gisele Itie), the dictator’s daughter and their local help, out of his mind. When Gunnar Jensen (Dolph Lundgren), a former Expendable kicked out by Ross, tries to kill him on the behest of James Monroe (Eric Roberts), the rouge CIA agent behind Garza, Ross decides to go back for Sandra alone as there is no money involved but his team- Yin Yang (Jet Li), Hale Caesar (Terry Crews) and Toll Road (Randy Couture) and Christmas won’t let him go alone.

Made on a lavish budget of $82 million The Expendables is a throwback to the old style of action flicks with crazy one-liners every now and then, an explosion here, a chase there and some emotion interludes thrown in for good measure. Written and directed by Sylvester Stallone the film is meant for largely the true fans and even then it’s a little difficult to like this film.

Stallone who has the Rocky series to his credit isn’t the writer that he used to be or perhaps the world isn’t the same anymore. The writing is insipid to say the least and you find it difficult to laugh at the jokes or to emote in a poignant moment. Of course, the film has its moments when everything seems to fit in but suddenly you are reminded of the harsh reality that The Expendables is more like retirement plan for washed out action stars than a film!

The cast of The Expendables looks like a who’s who of the 1980’s. Barring Jason Statham, Stallone gets just about every cult action film regular right from Dolph Lundgren (Universal Soldier), Eric Roberts (Runaway Train), Mickey Rourke and Jet Li besides himself to act in this action film. He even manages to rope in old pals and business partners in Planet Hollywood Arnold Schwarzenegger and Bruce Willis for blink and you miss cameos.

The never ending stag dance that now seems routine and highly boring, The Expendables shows that there’s still some gas in tanks of relics in the form of 3 good lines (one of them being Monroe’s comparison to Gazra’s situation as ‘bad Shakespeare’), 2 good action sequences (especially the one where Christmas and Ross blow up the pier) and 1 really innovative shot even by Stallone standards! The Expendables is tough even if you are a trooper!

Rating: 2 out of 5

Peepli [Live]

12:30 AM Posted by Gautam Chintamani , , , No comments

Unable to pay off the bank’s loan Budhia (Raghuvir Yadav) and Natha (Omkar Das Manikuri) stand to lose their ancestral land. Like millions of farmers across India they have no one to turn to and when they seek help from, Bhai Thakur (Sitaram Panchal), the local MLA, they are that the only way the government can help them is if they were to commit suicide. Burdened by just about everything in sight Budhia, a single man, decides to end his life but Natha won’t have any of it. The two brothers fight it out and ultimately Natha decides to end his life. They celebrate their last few troubled days and Rakesh (Nowaz), a local journalist, ends up overhearing an inebriated Natha’s plan. Miffed with his editor for not treating him well, Rakesh prints Natha’s story sets off a chain of events. The story spreads like a wildfire and every news channel in the nation descends upon the sleepy village of Peepli to capture the first farmer suicide on camera. A simpleton, Natha is unable to fathom the gravity of the situation and soon his life becomes a circus where every one- the local MLA, the state’s Chief Minister, the IAS machinery, the Agriculture Minster and even his own family starts playing him. Natha’s straightforward dream to free his family from the hardships ends up becoming a nightmare that sucks the life out of him.

Simply put Anusha Rizvi’s Peepli [Live] is a very well executed film that not only manages to address a serious political and social issue that has plagued India for some years now but also tells a compelling story. One of the reasons why Peeli [Live] works is the fact that it is written and directed by someone who is far removed from the escapist world of Mumabi filmmaking. Rizvi’s strong political identity administers a script that is deeply rooted in present times and yet never really takes over the narrative of the film.

The film might be about the plight of the poor Indian farmer who has been abandoned by everyone but it rises above the basic premise and makes a bold statement about the sorry state of the manner in which this nation has been functioning. From planning a story just for TRP, politicians out maneuvering each other to remain ahead, the administrative services becoming a lapdog of those in power, the callousness of journalists in their bid to break a story, Peepli [Live] talks about how the common citizens are being hoodwinked at every step of their existence. The scenes where the Block Development Officer tells the powers be that there isn’t a single scheme to help a distressed farmer who is still alive sums up the system’s apparent lack of empathy.

Replete with black humor Peepli [Live] might just the likes of Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron as far as satire in popular Hindi cinema goes. More importantly by managing to bring forth a serious issue without being overtly heavy and yet not sugarcoat the proceedings like a Munnabhai Part 2 or 3 Idiots, Peepli [Live] manages to achieve some thing that most ‘issue’ based commercial films lack.

The first half of Peepli [Live] is really taut and barring the song Mehangai Dayan, which is almost like an interlude, nothing is out of place. Rizvi gets a very gripping performance from her lead Omkar Das Manikpuri and the veteran Raghuvir Yadav, whose camaraderie with Manikpuri forms the backbone of the film. Most of the actors are from the late theatre legend Habib Tanvir’s group Naya Theatre and their excellent casting provides Peepli [Live] a very real and untreated feel. Rizvi’s dialogues provide all the actors especially Natha’s nagging wife Dhaniya (Shalini Vatsa) and his bedridden beedi puffin mother (Farrukh Jaffar) the true fabric to don. Additionally Vishal Sharma and Malaika Shenoy, who play the leading news reporters, get their nuances bang on. Sharma deserves a special mention for fitting well into the know-all-truth-be-danmed sensationalism laden misogynist Deepak. Naseeruddin Shah as the suave minister Salim Kidwai, who says the right thing at the right place is a treat.

Throughout the film Rizvi uses Hori Mahato, a frail farmer who keeps digging the dry earth for reasons no one knows, as the motif of the wounded farmer. The sight of Mahto is strong enough to rattle one’s senses and draws the attention towards the core issue of the film but for a long part she decides to leave things unexplained. Towards the end of the film, Rakesh, the journalist who sets the balling rolling, is moved beyond repair by Mahto’s death and wants to do some thing but is ticked off by Nandita, who like the state sees nothing new or out of the ordinary about his death. To some the ending of Peepli [Live] might seem weak and even unconvincing but the truth of the matter is this film isn’t like a television debate that promises to provide a solution by the end of the program.

Image: Bolly Curry


Friday, August 6, 2010

Predators

4:44 AM Posted by Gautam Chintamani , , No comments

*This review might contain spoilers

Royce (Adrien Brody) wakes up in mid air to find himself tumbling from the sky towards a dense jungle. A mercenary, Royce has no clue about his whereabouts and meets up with other people who seem to have landed on the ground in a similar fashion. The eight of them all have nefarious background except for Edwin (Topher Grace), a doctor, who sticks out like a sore thumb. Becoming the unlikely leader of the pack Royce discovers empty cages and dead bodies as he leads them to higher ground to figure out their location. Soon the group realizes that they are on an alien planet that seems to be a game reserve where they are being hunted by a ruthless alien race simply called Predators.


Back in 1987 when the first Predator hit the screen the big question would have been what the hell is the thing that is hunting the humans but two decades and several sequels later the concept doesn’t really hold any charm. With no surprise in finding out who/ what is hunting them the characters are more concerned with the place they land up in, which kind of adds a little suspense to the film in the initial portions.


Based on an idea submitted by Robert Rodriguez, way back in 1994, Predators is directed by Nimrod Antal, best known for his debut Kontroll, who manages to get the franchise back to its roots. Aiming to do away with the rather cartoonish take that recent Predator films especially Alien vs. Predtor threw up, Antal tries to concentrate more on the mood more than anything. It’s very difficult to look for ‘story’ in such genre films and knowing this only too well, writers Alex Litvak and Michael Finch structure the film in manner that has more style as opposed to substance. Having said that Predators nevertheless manages to hold pretty well for almost two thirds of the film and it’s only when the creatures are visible does the film start to plummet.


Predators is more of a mood piece more than anything. It does have the necessary action sequences, some of the pretty decent and is replete with the customary one-liners but don’t expect the world from the screenplay. Chosen for a specific purpose of ensuring people don’t recall Arnold Schwarzenegger, the original lead, Adrien Brody manages to grunt his way through the role. By the end of the film he starts looking like a walking advertisement for body supplements. The rest of the crew doesn’t really do that bad a job but a little more detailing especially with Laurence Fishburne’s catatonic Noland, would have helped.


The good thing about Predators is that it’s a complete throwback to the old style of action films that rely less on special effects. Even if you aren’t a fan of the series, Predators is decent enough excuse to munch some popcorn.


Rating: 2/5


Image- Movie Moron


Aisha

2:28 AM Posted by Gautam Chintamani , , No comments
*This article assumes you have seen the film!


The chronicles of aimless rich kids have been the centerpiece of commercial Hindi cinema for decades. Yash Chopra once commented that he made his characters hopelessly rich so that he won’t waste time showing the trials of love conquering the social disparity amongst other things. Karan Johar and the ilk have mastered this craft and now it’s almost impossible to imagine a classic ‘ameer-gareeb pyaar ki kahani’. So Aisha does venture into a relatively new territory as far as the popular Hindi cinema is concerned. Moving beyond GAP as seen on Shah Rukh Khan in KKHH, Aisha showcases Salvatore Ferragamo, Christian Dior, and Chanel as a part of Aisha’s very existence.


No, this isn’t the real reason why Aisha breaks new ground.


Beyond showcasing just about designer parked in the ground floor of DLF Emporio Mall or making the mall which the builder claims to be India's Most Luxurious Shopping Destination almost a room in Aisha’s house, this is the first time a film centers on a spoilt brat who never really transforms into an exemplary citizen!


Aisha lives in a life sized doll house and perhaps never really looks beyond the lunch date or the gig in the evening for which she has found the perfect dress. There isn‘t anything bad in such a character, after all this is a film and one doesn’t expect any life altering solutions from a work of fiction. But isn’t the transformation of a protagonist meant to be the backbone of story? Or could it be that some tales don’t really need characters to live the arc, say for instance, someone like Ram from the Ramayana. While everything and everyone changes in the span of the epic tale, Ram never really transforms. Even when he throws his wife out of his life just because some random person said some thing more random it’s not the part of the main story, if you know what I mean.


Looking back rich spoilt brats might be shining examples of everything good or bad in the society but as far as Hindi films are concerned they have always transformed in the course of the film. A boy agrees to leave his house to rough it out in order to convince the girl’s father that he is more than his father’s son (Maine Pyar Kiya), a troubled rich brat becomes the knight in shining amour for a young widow when love comes to town (Deewana), urged and accompanied by his father to live his life to the fullest we know that Raj will perhaps adorn the cover of Fortune magazine once married to Simran (Dilwale Dhulanhiya Le Jayenge) and some years were enough to make Raj (yeah again) to realize life’s isn’t all ha-ha he-he (Kuch Kuch Hota Hai), Aakash and Sameer might be affable imps but when the time comes they will stop traversing the city for a piece of cake (Dil Chahta Hai). Aisha has learnt not to treat people like projects, won the man of her dreams and even decided to get a job has she really changed? Even though Arjun looks at her as nothing more than a vanglorious brat who is wasting her life away, he can’t help but feel protective and to some extent responsible about Aisha. Aisha realizes her folly when Pinky walks out of her life but even the loss of a childhood friend and Arjun’s taunts don’t really open her eyes. The same thing repeats itself again when Shefali points out some truths but Aisha still never realizes her so called shallowness. Of course, she means no apparent harm and yes at places she operates on very simple Garfield hang-out-with-fatter-people-in-order-to-look-thin logic but nothing seems to get to this woman!


The lead character remains one of the weakest links of Aisha. Aisha’s overbearing presence on the proceedings ends up making all the women characters seem like a bad copy of each other for a larger part of the film. Pinky, Shefali and Aisha are same same but different. Aisha’s friends seem to fulfill two important needs of her- Pinky is the ‘real’ one which ostensibly means what Aisha should never be and Shefali is the ‘new’ one which gives Aisha a chance to ‘start’ all over again. Even Arjun points this out to her but while she thinks of him as the one thing that makes sense in her life, her only connection with the ‘other’ world, she never listens to him.


The men in the film- Randhir, Arjun, Dhurv, Suarabh as well as the elders are well etched and surprisingly have more meat than either Pinky or Aisha. This also seems to be a strange thing keeping in mind Aisha’s creative team is a salute to woman power. There’s not much to think about here- men are, as the parlance of our times goes, easier to understand so Arjun is the man you can take home to meet your mom, Randhir is the rich dude who is very simple scratch-where-it-itches kind of guy, the papa’s the safety net, the uncle is a strong softie, the man servant is a loving punching bag, and Dhruv is the friendly neighborhood hunk who will perfunctory cheat till he’s not married.


Its not that the titular role isn’t well written but it demanded a certain kind of tightrope walk which Sonam Kapoor never gets the hang of. While possessing the correct lineage, Sonam Kapoor just about manages to get Aisha right. Yes, she looks the part, she is stylish, dresses the part and even manages to get nuances right every now and then but one gets a feeling that she is a tad too conscious of the camera. Looking at her performance you tend to get a feeling that she is more consumed by the thought of playing a character like Aisha as opposed to actually playing her! It’s not that Kapoor won’t convince you of Aisha’s impish ways but she looks weak especially when surrounded by some really good characters.


So how come the film still works?


To a great extent its Devika Bhagat’s writing that makes Aisha’s rose tinted world largely believable. Bhagat nattily adapts Jane Austen’s Emma into a world that we might have lived, seen or at least heard about. While I may have not seen Bhagat’s popular TV series (Mahi Way), if her writing in Aisha is a parameter, then I’m sure the show would have been great. Looking at the subject and the credits one would have thought of Aisha as a chick flick or keeping in mind that Anil Kapoor produced this film even worse. Conceived as a vehicle for Sonam Kapoor who wasn’t getting any roles to showcase her talent, Aisha always ran the risk of becoming a vanity project for the star daughter. Thankfully Bhagat’s writing doesn’t allow Aisha to become a full blown Sonam Kapoor show. Managing to infuse life into almost all the character, Bhagat’s writing, that has some excellent lines peppered throughout the film ensures, that her characters don’t remain cardboard cut-outs.


Too much has been said about Sonam Kapoor’s exquisite sense of style and you won’t be let down if that’s what you seek but thankfully Aisha has more to offer than Sonam’s poise.

Click here for my review of the Aisha.

Image- Bollywood Hungama