wanting the popcorn to save the film is in bad taste

Sunday, June 22, 2008

A personal history of a Revolution

6:12 PM Posted by Unknown No comments

How does one judge a film that one has read as a book? We know the story of the little girl and her family in Iran during the 70's and the 80's. But what the two directors are able to bring to the movie is a certain sense of community and the several layers of life which I felt the book lacked.

The best scenes visually are the war scenes, groups running out during an air raid and also when the protagonist's uncle treks across the country to escape arrest. Although in black and white, these scenes come alive and actually complement the original art work in the graphic novel. The sound design and music actually work here. That said in term of writing I enjoyed the "Punk is not ded" scene where the little girl cooks up a story of her evil step mother to escape the moral police.

The most endearing character is the grandmother who often refers to how the society was when she was young. The funny thing is that she is always claims that during earlier times people (in Iran) were more open minded. This is in direct contrast to arguments in the West who see any history as a progress towards a more open society. I have often felt that in the last ten years our societies have become more conservative and boring compared to the 90's.

The problem with the film is the same as the book. The history of a nation cannot be judged through the eyes of one person. Often such stories exaggerate the pain that a small group went through and force us to pass judgment on the country or its people based on those emotions.

There is a scene in the film where a woman has to go to a hospital administrator to ask permission to take her husband out of the country for an operation. She realizes that this is her former window cleaner and is horrified but she pretends not to recognize him. But since she has to plead her case with him she is very angry. This is a typical middle class reaction to political changes in society. They just cannot accept the fact that "illiterate" or "lower class" people can take over power and choose for others. Something the elites have been doing for centuries and created a problem in the first place.

One last point. The two times the protagonist steps into Europe the film turns into colour. After all the good stuff in black & white that just did not work for me.

Saturday, June 14, 2008

What Just Happened!??!

11:22 PM Posted by Gautam Chintamani , , No comments
There he goes again! M. Night Shyamalan has done it again. Just saw The Happening and couldn't help but feel confused by the end of it. Usually when I end up watching a bad film, especially in a movie hall, I am besieged with a horrendous headache and am irritable. This is a sure shot way of finding out if the film was bad. This time around I couldn't figure out if I should have a headache or not. The question that I have been asking myself since I got out of the darkened theater is WHAT JUST HAPPENED?

M. Night Shyamalan comes across as a man who seems to know a thing or two about the things we don't. Anyone who has seen The Sixth Sense would vouch for this. I mean who thought of making a film about a child who reveals to a doctor that he sees dead people? And all this while no one talks to the bloody doctor! But since The Sixth Sense every Shyamalan film has been a let down in one manner or the other. Here is a guy who might have stretched his single rubber-band of an idea a little too far.

The Happening is a film about a paranoid family that is on the run from god knows what, which is killing people in a manner most cinematic. The man and the woman have hit a rough patch in their marriage. I don't blame them for what do you expect if the woman's idea of cheating on her husband is having a tiramisu with someone called joey from work!? The man's best friend keeps making faces and telling him that something is wrong with the woman and the woman can't take it that the man has told their 'secrets' to the world. Come on lady! If you act like a wide-eyed mare every time the camera is on ya, what do you expect the people to make of it! The Happening is about something that no one knows. Methinks if so be the case then maybe the bloody thing isn't happening!!!!!!

In case you are planning to watch the film go with very low expectations. There are really good moments in The Happening but nothing more than that. The best thing about The Happening is that thankfully M. Night Shyamalan isn't acting in it! We are saved for if we could have survived whatever it was killing the people in The Happening and the bad acting by the lead, we wouldn't have survived M. Night in an extended walk on role. (Read my review of The Happening here)

I think Shyamalan should get around making a film out of
Life With Pi, something that he was planning to do. This would give him an opportunity to get away from his 'genre' and allow people to see a different shade of him. After all if you believed that being #1 in the field of 1 was a win-win situation then take a closer look.

Image: www.startv.com

Monday, June 9, 2008

The Sound of 80's

4:26 AM Posted by Gautam Chintamani , , No comments
What is the one big difference between the films of 1980’s and any other time?

The music.
Barring a handful of films most stand out films made in the 1980’s have really bad music. Noting could substantiate my claim better than William Friedkin’s To Live and Die in LA (1985).

Most of us don’t think of William Friedkin beyond The French Connection and The Exorcist and many of us wouldn’t have had the opportunity to experience the last big film he made, Crusing, featuring Al Pacino. Friedkin’s LA is almost like a precursor to most of the action stuff that we were subjected to in the mid and late 1980’s.

The story might come across as very straight and simple but in the hands of Friedkin it is anything but that. A cop loses his partner while pursuing a master counterfeiter and his one point short-term aim in life is to put the guy in jail. He and his new partner approach the fraudster with a job but can’t raise the advance needed to get the task going. The cops end up robbing a diamond dealer who eventually dies in the bargain. They soon learn that the dealer was actually an undercover cop. The guilt starts taking its toll on one of the cops but the other one couldn’t care less for he is only interested in avenging his partner’s death. At the trade off things go bad and everyone cops it barring the guilt-ridden cop. If you thought the seemingly upright police officer would change his ways, you couldn’t be more wrong. He carries on as if nothing ever happened and moreover he becomes someone who, after seeing it all, doesn’t really mind pushing the limits.

The film stands and delivers even after two decades and you have to see the chase scene here to believe that Friedkin could better the one from The French Connection. Shot in gang territory the film successfully depicts Los Angeles as never before. So much so that a lot of John Woo films that eventually inspired Tarantino might have taken in a lot from this underrated Friedkin gem. It’s the then contemporary music of Wang Chung that fails To Live and Die in LA. According to film trivia Friedkin zeroed in on them as he felt that the band stood out from the rest of contemporary music! There’s even a title track with cheesy vocals. Something that Friedkin had specially instructed to avoid but changed his mind when he heard the track!

The second example would be Michael Mann’s Manhunter. A fantastic film that still beats the crap out of the Brett Ratner version any day of the week; only the music sounds dated. Even the soundtracks of Top Gun, Beverly Hills Cop soundtrack seems jarring today. Many would consider the soundtrack of the cult classic The Blade Runner by Vangelies a mismatch today.

A majority of the filmmakers who were calling the shots in the 1980’s were the hot shots of 1970’s whose clout was lessening thanks to the failing Michael Cinimo’s Heavens Gates. I think this is what pushed them to include what was fashionable then when it came to music. In any case a decade besieged with sequels expecting anything good would have been a difficult thing! Let’s be grateful for a handful of films that turned out to be great movies for what’d film viewing be without a Raging Bull (1980), The Shining (1985), Amadeus (1984) and The Blade Runner (1982).

Image: www.amazon.com