wanting the popcorn to save the film is in bad taste

Showing posts with label Sanjay Leela Bhansali. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sanjay Leela Bhansali. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Ishtyle Bhai

What do you do when the film you labored over for months turns out to be an unmitigated disaster at the box office?

Some times people blame shift and accuse the audiences’ incapacity to crack it. Sanjay Leela Bhansali is an old hand at this. Thanks to a film called Khamoshi-The Musical and its dismal performance, Mr. Bhansali is ready to fight it out with everyone and then some. Mr. Bhansali went to the extent of saying that people weren’t ready to understand the suggested nuances of whatever-the-hell-he-was-trying-to-do-in-any-case in the name of Saawariya. Others like Vinod Chopra refuse to believe that their film is bad. He still thinks that Eklavya- The Royal Guard is the long lost twin of some hidden-from-the-world David Lean masterpiece.

In the recent past I endured an interview of the Vijay Krishna Acharya, the director of the Tashan on the telly. The film in itself is an experience that words can’t capture. Many of you must be familiar with my take on the film and in case you missed out then read it here. The stupid thing about the interview was that it was too soon after the tanking of the film as the poor guy had such a confused looked plasters on his face. This futile PR exercise convinced me that Vijay Krishna Acharya still hadn’t gotten over the shock of its failure. Or maybe he was still not over the shock that he was actually greenlit by Aditya Chopra to make Tashan.

No.

Wait a minute.

I think it looked as if Acharya were still in shock that he managed to get a Grade A cast for Tashan.

No.

I think it was more to do with the fact that his film had released. He was trying to recall the faces of his buddies whose films never released.

Whatever was the exact reason he was not comfy and in such places mere mortals such as us usually end up thinking that attack is the best form of defense. So off he went and even suggested that perhaps people didn’t accept the amorality of his character. Hence some blokes in Kanpur or Katwaria Sarai couldn’t connect with them and expectantly the film tanked. The interviewer, Ms. Anupama Chopra, could have interjected that the same people happily embraced the same production houses Bunty Aur Babli with all their imperfections. Ms. Chopra didn’t ask as she was in shock that Aditya Chopra called her and asked her to interview Mr. Tashan for (a) she was grinning from ear-to-ear and (b) the interview was interspersed with promos of the film!

The big question here is how much time does a director need to get over a failure? Is there a thing called getting over failure for many of Mumbai’s finest never forget. Ram Gopal Verma rehashed Drohi and gave us Satya, repackaged Raat and made it Bhoot while Mr. Bhansali married Khamoshi and The Mircale Worker to offer Black.

Almost a month after Tashan’s release I bumped into Vijay Krishna Acharya at a café in Delhi. He was very recognizable thanks to my elephantine memory and his serpentine moustache. To be doubly sure I asked him if he were who I thought he was; he nodded in affirmation. I told him that I loved Akshay Kumar’s Ramlila-Ravan-on-a-Bajaj-Scooter entry in his film. He shook my hand and thanked me. He went out for a smoke (my guess). He had his customary confused look back. My friend told me that no one would have told him that anything good about the film and maybe he thinks I was being sarcastic. Once he came back to finally leave the café, he looked at me and flashed a smile. As he got out his look was threatening to come back.

I really liked the Akshay Kumar’s entry.

I did. I did!

Monday, May 5, 2008

Meenaxi- Making Sense Now

Some times you watch a film and just don’t get it. Is it that difficult to understand a film? Is it really necessary to ‘get’ it? Not understanding a film can mean so many different things. I didn't understand Meenaxi- A Tale of 3 Cities and while we are at it, I didn’t decipher Anurag Kashyap’s No Smoking, Saawariya and Tashan but it's not the same thing!

I’m not of the opinion that Meenaxi is the second greatest piece of filmmaking after Sholay but at least there was something in it. To call Meenaxi a celebration of life, an amalgamation of art forms would be slightly over the top but not completely incorrect. To call No Smoking a surreal exploration on the part of the filmmaker to venture into hitherto uncharted areas as far as popular Hindi cinema is concerned would be a load of crap.

The follow-up to the hugely disappointing Gajagamini, Meenaxi shows the sheer brilliance of M.F. Hussain. The film is about Nawab, a writer identified solely thanks to the biggest writers block that seems to tag along with him, bumping into the beautiful Meenaxi at his sisters wedding. Meenaxi dares Nawab to use her as a muse and finally get around writing his novel. Bustling with new ideas ever since Meenaxi stepped into his life, Nawab forges ahead. He starts writing the story and sets it in Jaisalmer. The local foul-mouthed mechanic, Kunal, too finds a place in Nawab’s book. Fed up with Meenaxi’s constant bickering when, in the book, things start getting boring in Jaiselmer; Nawab turns the story around and sets it Prague. Obsessed with Meenaxi, Nawab can’t help but enter his story. The line between reality, myth, dream and fiction blur with Nawab dying before finishing his work. But is he dead in the book or in reality? Is Meenaxi really there or is it just Nawab’s personification of the ultimate woman?

Confused, aren’t you?

To say the least the ending left me wondering as well. Under normal circumstances I should have been livid for the trick played by Hussain on me. But I wasn’t angry. Two of my friends (thanks Sudhesh and Ravinder) always talked highly of Meenaxi and I always wondered if the trials of life had finally gotten to them. I was pleasantly surprised by Meenaxi and why not.

The film is beautifully shot and by that I don’t mean just setting up the shot or shooting gorgeous locales. The composition of shots, the production design and just about everything in the film gives you an insight into the mind of M.F. Hussain. Another great thing about Meenaxi is that Mr. Hussain made it at the age of 89 (give or take a year or two) and the sheer fact that he learnt from his mistakes as a filmmaker on Gajagamini to come up with something as eclectic as Meenaxi is an achievement in itself. Apart from writing, prodcuing and directing the film, Mr. Hussain has penned the awesome Noor Un Ala, which is one the better Qawaalis from Hindi films.
Hundreds of films are set in various cities of the world but only a few use them as a character. Hyderabad and Prague are almost as important as the lead players of the Meenaxi. Tabu shines as the Meenaxi and Raghubir Yadav is really used well for the first time since Massey Sahib (bet many of you won't remember the film!). Kunal Kapoor portrays Mary's lost lamb to the hilt. The film could have used better editing and a general overhauling of the script but still manages to impress. I can’t say the same about No Smoking or Saawariya!

Is the inability to ‘understand’ a film, a failure of the filmmaker?

Are we completely supposed to understand a film or is there a window that shouldn’t really open as much as promised?

The idea of a film should be to add that something extra to what you have to, perhaps, come up with something extraordinary. I mean one can’t rely on interpretation every time, now can we...Mr. Bhansali… Mr. Kashyap?